On this page
The short answer
It can cut both ways — and workers usually assume only the bad half.
The bad half: a prior award of permanent disability is conclusively presumed to still exist under § 4664(b), which reduces what the current employer owes.
The half nobody mentions: a prior disability may open a SIBTF claim — money in addition to what your employer owes.
What actually reduces your case
§ 4664(b): where there has been a prior award of permanent disability, that disability is conclusively presumed to still exist.
Note what that requires: a prior award. A prior claim that resolved by Compromise and Release without an award of permanent disability is not a prior award — and § 4664(b) gets asserted more often than it applies. Ask to see the prior award.
And § 4663 apportionment is to the causation of disability. Be careful with Lindh*: under City of Petaluma v. WCAB (Lindh) (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 1175, a pre-existing condition that never disabled you *can support apportionment — prior disability is no longer a prerequisite. What the defense must still prove is that the condition actually caused part of this disability, on substantial medical evidence.
Under Escobedo, the opinion must explain how and why. A percentage attached to "prior injury" without reasoning is not substantial evidence. How to attack an apportionment opinion.
What may increase it — SIBTF
The Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund exists for workers who had a pre-existing disability and then suffered an industrial injury that, combined, produces a substantially greater disability.
It is paid by a state fund, not by your employer — which means it is genuinely additional money, and it is chronically under-claimed.
And it changed. SB 171 rewrote SIBTF effective July 2026, retroactively, with a June 1, 2026 grandfather snapshot.
Every SIBTF page in California written before that is now describing a system that no longer exists. What changed and what it means.
A prior disability that qualifies does not have to be industrial. A congenital condition, a prior non-work injury, or a medical condition can be the pre-existing disability.
Which is why honesty at the deposition matters
You will be asked about prior injuries and prior claims under oath. More on testifying.
Answer honestly. A prior injury does not defeat your claim, and it may be worth money. What does destroy a claim is denying something that appears in a medical record somewhere — and it always appears in a medical record somewhere.
Talk to a lawyer
Free consultation. No fee unless we recover. You are not responsible for costs we advance if there is no recovery.
General information about California law, not legal advice about your case.
Law Offices of Solov & Teitell, APC · (213) 380-9310 · 24/7 (213) 463-6469
Printed from https://www.solovteitell.com/answers/i-had-a-workers-comp-case-before/ · Last reviewed 2026-08-23