The short answer
There is no jury, it usually takes a few hours rather than days, and most of it was decided before anyone walked into the room.
A workers' compensation trial is a hearing on a paper record, with a judge. It is far less dramatic and far more document-driven than people expect.
The shape of the day
You appear at the district office, go through security, and wait — often longer than the hearing itself takes. What each office is actually like.
A workers' compensation judge, no jury. The judge has read, or will read, the medical reports.
The issues are stated on the record — what is actually in dispute, which is usually narrower than it felt getting there.
Exhibits go in. Medical reports, the QME or AME report, records, wage statements, the DWC-1. This is most of the case.
Testimony is usually just you, and often for under an hour. Sometimes a witness. Rarely a doctor in person — doctors are deposed instead.
Then it ends without a decision. The judge takes it under submission and issues a written decision later. Labor Code § 5313 gives the judge 30 days after the case is submitted to make and file findings on every fact in the controversy, together with an award or order — and to serve, with it, "a summary of the evidence received and relied upon and the reasons or grounds upon which the determination was made." Nobody announces a verdict in the room. That summary-of-the-evidence sentence is worth knowing about: a decision that states a conclusion without saying which evidence produced it is a decision with a problem on its face.
What decides it
The medical-legal report, more than anything else. Whether it is substantial evidence, whether its history is accurate, and whether its apportionment is explained rather than asserted. What makes a report hold up.
Your credibility, which in a disputed case is close to the whole case — and which is built out of consistency across everything you have already said, not out of how you perform on the day.
And what was disclosed in time. Under § 5502(d)(3) discovery generally closes at the mandatory settlement conference, and evidence not disclosed there is generally inadmissible. Cases are lost on this.
What to actually do
Read your own deposition transcript before you go, if you gave one. You will be asked about it.
Reread the medical reports. You are allowed to disagree with them out loud; you are not allowed to be surprised by them.
Answer the question asked, and stop. The most common damage at a workers' compensation trial is a truthful answer that wandered into a subject nobody had asked about.
Say "I don't know" and "I don't remember" when they are true. They are complete answers and they are not weaknesses.
Ask for an interpreter if you need one. Free, and your right — a qualified interpreter at treatment appointments under § 4600(g), a certified one at an employer-requested medical examination under § 4600(f), and one at your deposition under § 5710(b)(5). How to get one.
Most cases never get here
The great majority settle, often at the mandatory settlement conference. That is not a failure — it is how the system is designed to work, and a settlement reached with a full record is usually a better outcome than a contested trial.
But being genuinely ready for trial is what produces a fair settlement number. Those are the same preparation. Settle or try it.
Sources
Labor Code § 5700 (hearing procedure) · § 5502(d)(3) (discovery closure at the mandatory settlement conference) · § 5313 (findings and award in writing) · § 4600(f), (g) (interpreters — certified at examinations, qualified at treatment) · § 5710(b)(5) (depositions) · § 5811(b)(2) (hearings) · 8 CCR § 10750 et seq. (hearing and trial rules).
General information about California law, not legal advice about your case.
Law Offices of Solov & Teitell, APC · (213) 380-9310 · 24/7 (213) 463-6469
Printed from https://www.solovteitell.com/answers/what-happens-at-trial/ · Last reviewed 2026-08-23